LabelFlash vs. LightScribe: Tom's goes for the burn

Original post: click here

Subscribe to these comments

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Neutral

pcphantom @ Jun 16th 2008 8:23PM

The appeal is not having to use ink, not needing a seperate printer at all, and never having to worry about your image fading or rubbing off. I have one of those printers, the disks are more expensive, nearly as much as light scribe is now and they are a pain to use in comparison.

I even have light scribe on my laptop, I went over to my sisters on mothers day and burned her a disk with a bunch of pictures on it, then flipped the disk over and burned our family photo on the other side of the disk. It was quick, easy and very nice, not something I could have done at all with my cd printer unless I brough my luggage.

Add your comments

New Users

Name

E-mail

Current Users

E-mail:

Password

Remember Me

E-Mail me when someone replies to this comment

replying to thread #12684732

Add your comments:

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br /> tags.

Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments. And yes, comments are moderated.